Hans,
just accidentally, I discovered that \XeTeX\ misbehaves:
\starttext
\input{zapf} \XETEX\ \input{knuth}
\stoptext
BTW, this is the MWE after I saw
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/luametatex.pdf#page=15.
I hope it helps,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
| running command: xetex --ini --etex --8bit
cont-en.mkii \dump
makes vista complain:
=
xetex.exe - Unable to Locate Component
This application has failed to start because xetex.dll was not found.
=
Pressing OK, xetex crashes and things continue until
2. m
Dear syndicate,
As mentioned in my other message, "first-setup.bat weirdness I: cloned
system" I've now switched to the first-setup.bat way of updating. Two
pieces of weirdness on the main machine:
1. mtx-context | running command: xetex --ini --etex --8bit
cont-en.mkii \du
mkiv with luatex?
I would like to, but I need to use TrueType fonts for Indian scripts in
my work that are supported in XeTeX but not (yet) in LuaTeX.
As an experiment, I tried to use the so-called 'long s' in a Fraktur
font, which comes out well in XeTeX with LaTeX, but I must be doing
something
On 7/6/2015 9:13 AM, Robert Zydenbos wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folk,
Is there any simple way to pass font features as a parameter to
XeConTeXt? i am thinking of things like what in LaTeX would be (between
square brackets) \setromanfont [AutoFakeSlant=0.5, AutoFakeBold=0.5]
{Doulos SIL Phon}.
There
Robert Zydenbos mailto:cont...@zydenbos.net
6. Juli 2015 12:15
I would like to, but I need to use TrueType fonts for Indian scripts in
my work that are supported in XeTeX but not (yet) in LuaTeX.
As an experiment, I tried to use the so-called 'long s' in a Fraktur
font, which comes out well
Dear ConTeXt folk,
Is there any simple way to pass font features as a parameter to
XeConTeXt? i am thinking of things like what in LaTeX would be (between
square brackets) \setromanfont [AutoFakeSlant=0.5, AutoFakeBold=0.5]
{Doulos SIL Phon}.
There has to be some way to do this, but I seem
On my Mac (Mountain Lion) I would like to use ConTeXt with a complex OpenType
font named Kedage for the Indian language Kannada, and I thought that I could
do this using XeTeX (because LuaTeX seems unable to handle Indic fonts at
present).
This freely available font (found on Linux systems
On 8/8/2013 1:00 PM, Robert Zydenbos wrote:
On my Mac (Mountain Lion) I would like to use ConTeXt with a complex OpenType
font named Kedage for the Indian language Kannada, and I thought that I could
do this using XeTeX (because LuaTeX seems unable to handle Indic fonts at
present).
forget
Hans,
Just now I tried your suggestions:
On Aug 8, 2013, at 13:51 , Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Here I see two possibilities:
(1) use the XeTeX parameters FakeSlant and FakeBold, which I have done in
LaTeX. But I do not know how this is done in ConTeXt.
\starttext
On 8/8/2013 2:26 PM, Robert Zydenbos wrote:
Is there any way to find out the font's possibilities, if one doesn't have any
technical documentation about it?
looking at tables in the font ... in fact, this font is somewhat messed
up as it uses latin glyph names for kannaga ligatures
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
forget about xetex, first check what context mkiv van do
Sorry to hijack this thread, but...
Hans, it would be great to see Indic languages support in
context/mkiv. At the moment I am typesetting, for example, in
Malayalam using
I just read in contextgarden.net the following:
Note that XeTeX uses mkii and LuaTeX uses mkiv ; in principle mkii is frozen
so new features and improvements will only happen in mkiv.
I use the ConTeXt which comes in TEXLIVE 2012, which I assume uses Mark IV.
Does that mean that I can
On 2013–02–22 hwit...@gmail.com wrote:
I use the ConTeXt which comes in TEXLIVE 2012, which I assume uses Mark IV.
Does that mean that I can not use this version of ConTeXt with XeteX which
also comes packaged in TEXLIVE?
You can use MkII with XeTeX as follows:
context --xetex
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:25 PM, hwit...@gmail.com wrote:
I just read in contextgarden.net the following:
Note that XeTeX uses mkii and LuaTeX uses mkiv ; in principle mkii is
frozen so new features and improvements will only happen in mkiv.
I use the ConTeXt which comes in TEXLIVE
Thanks for the helpful information.
I didn't know tha MkII was included in the distribution or about the --xetex
option.
Darel
Marco Patzer home...@lavabit.com wrote:
On 2013–02–22 hwit...@gmail.com wrote:
I use the ConTeXt which comes in TEXLIVE 2012, which I assume uses Mark
IV
Thanks for the clear and detailed explanation. It helped clear up the
difference, or lak thereof between the -xtxx anf --xetex options for the
different scripts/programs.
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:25 PM, hwit...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/23/2012 7:29 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hi all,
Some people have been complaining that it is not possible to use XeTeX
with filenames containing parenthesis because XeTeX treats it as
filename quote char and this it gets
On 12/23/2012 7:29 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hi all,
Some people have been complaining that it is not possible to use XeTeX
with filenames containing parenthesis because XeTeX treats it as
filename quote char and this it gets stripped. Anyway, after some
searching it turned out this was added
Hi all,
Some people have been complaining that it is not possible to use XeTeX
with filenames containing parenthesis because XeTeX treats it as
filename quote char and this it gets stripped. Anyway, after some
searching it turned out this was added in 2004 for ConTeXt to workaround
some MetaPost
In response to Hans Hagen and Wolfgang Schuster's messages of Dec. 5,
Just to let you know, in response to your messages, I am working a
small, self-contained example that reproduces the problem.
However I have been asked to focus on a different project for a few
days, so ... please don't
the .tex files themselves upon request.
I would especially like to know better techniques for debugging -- how I
can induce TeX/ConTeXt to tell me more about what's going on. I realize
that as a macro language, this is inherently difficult with TeX.
We are heavily invested in XeTeX, so switching
language, this is inherently difficult with TeX.
yes, it's not always easy ... best is to make small tests (while
developing styles) and test those snippets ... due to tex's expansion
there can always be nasty interferences in complex setups
We are heavily invested in XeTeX, so switching
/Hans Hagen wrote (///Wed Dec 5 14:10:12 CET 2012/):/
On 12/5/2012 11:19 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
/ Hi all,
/
/...
/
/
//
// % Abbreviations
// \definestartstop
//[abblist]
//
Am 05.12.2012 um 16:46 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org:
/Hans Hagen wrote (///Wed Dec 5 14:10:12 CET 2012/):/
On 12/5/2012 11:19 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
/ Hi all,
/
/...
/
/
//
// % Abbreviations
Hi all,
are there people who use typescripts from my collection which are available
with minimals in combination with XeTeX.
I'm planing to remove the MkII files and will only keep files which are in use.
For people who use MkIV there is nothing to worry because these files will be
kept
On 18-3-2011 3:54, mathew wrote:
On Mar 14, 2011, at 16:49, Marco wrote:
I totally agree. But Cecil mentioned in another thread: »My document is mostly
text.« Even if a few mp graphics are involved luatex is still noticeably
slower.
I look at it from the perspective that the last time I used
On Mar 14, 2011, at 16:49, Marco wrote:
I totally agree. But Cecil mentioned in another thread: »My document is mostly
text.« Even if a few mp graphics are involved luatex is still noticeably
slower.
I look at it from the perspective that the last time I used TeX, my 8MHz Atari
ST took
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
--
Cecil Westerhof
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
MKII can be used either with pdftex or xetex (as you wish, compare
advantages/disadvantages
2011/3/14 Marco net...@lavabit.com
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
MKII can be used either with pdftex or xetex (as you wish
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/14 Marco net...@lavabit.com
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand
that you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other
On 14-3-2011 7:26, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
2011/3/14 Marconet...@lavabit.com
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhofcldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
MKII can be used
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 19:44, Marco wrote:
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof wrote:
2011/3/14 Marco wrote:
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand
that you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used
On 2011-03-14 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
xetex:
+ system fonts are easily accessible
- no protrusion, no font expansion
I never tried to use them, but I thought that Han The Thanh [please
add the accents] added that to XeTeX semi-recently
(http
Am Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:37:12 +0100 schrieb Thomas Schmitz:
I know that with the font fallback mechanism, it's
trivial to change fonts for unicode ranges,
Do you know where (roughly) the code for the fallback is? I would
like to know how it work.
--
Ulrike Fischer
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:02:03 +0100
Ulrike Fischer ne...@nililand.de wrote:
Do you know where (roughly) the code for the fallback
is? I would
like to know how it work.
--
You mean where it is actually defined in the core files? A
quick grep for fontfallback shows that it's in
Hi all,
on ctt, I just saw an annoucement for a xe(la)tex package
which I found quite interesting. Here's the description:
Location on CTAN: /macros/xetex/latex/ucharclasses
This package addresses one of the few features where TeX
still has to play catch-up to
word processing programs
On 21-12-2010 6:37, Thomas Schmitz wrote:
I was wondering: is something similar possible in mkiv yet? I know that
with the font fallback mechanism, it's trivial to change fonts for
unicode ranges, but is it possible to change hyphenation patterns (or
even insert arbitrary code) according to
with the vendor:
We just ask that you subset the font when exporting the PDFs ...
Do PDF's generated by XeTeX and LuaTeX subset the font in this way?
Regards,
John
--
John Magolske
http://B79.net/contact
___
If your
is not embedded
And in an email correspondence with the vendor:
We just ask that you subset the font when exporting the PDFs ...
Do PDF's generated by XeTeX and LuaTeX subset the font in this way?
Yes, this is the default. So unless you have manually interfered, the
included fonts are always
exporting the PDFs ...
Do PDF's generated by XeTeX and LuaTeX subset the font in this way?
Yes, this is the default. So unless you have manually interfered, the
included fonts are always subsetted.
Best wishes,
Taco
于 2010年08月17日 15:30, Giulio Bertellini 写道:
What exactly does it mean to subset the fonts, when the fonts are
included in a PDF?
Just included the used characters, not the whole font file.
___
If your question is of
of our
fonts in a PDF application ... the complete font is not embedded
And in an email correspondence with the vendor:
We just ask that you subset the font when exporting the PDFs ...
Do PDF's generated by XeTeX and LuaTeX subset the font in this way?
Yes, this is the default. So
On 08/17/2010 03:05 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Do PDF's generated by XeTeX and LuaTeX subset the font in this way?
Yes, this is the default. So unless you have manually interfered, the
included fonts are always subsetted.
I'm interested in the other way around, how can I tell luatex
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 08/17/2010 03:05 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Do PDF's generated by XeTeX and LuaTeX subset the font in this way?
Yes, this is the default. So unless you have manually interfered, the
included fonts are always subsetted.
I'm
Just included the used characters, not the whole font file.
Some of the other tables are also stripped down (not only the 'glyf'
table), so that the embedded font is not complete. In fact, some
programs will refuse to open the font if we extract it from the PDF,
which is precisely the idea of
On 17-8-2010 8:18, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Just included the used characters, not the whole font file.
Some of the other tables are also stripped down (not only the 'glyf'
table), so that the embedded font is not complete. In fact, some
programs will refuse to open the font if we extract
Hi,
I'm wondering how I can use Palatino for math in MKII/XeTeX? The following
works in MKIV but not in MKII (still get Computer Modern for Math, though main
text is in Palatino). Thanks very much!
Rio
Riobard wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how I can use Palatino for math in MKII/XeTeX? The
following works in MKIV but not in MKII (still get Computer Modern
for Math, though main text is in Palatino). Thanks very much!
[example missing]
Best wishes,
Taco
On 2-8-2010 3:35, Riobard wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how I can use Palatino for math in MKII/XeTeX? The following
works in MKIV but not in MKII (still get Computer Modern for Math, though main
text is in Palatino). Thanks very much!
in type-otf.mkii, search for xmath and add the following
wrote:
Riobard wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how I can use Palatino for math in MKII/XeTeX? The
following works in MKIV but not in MKII (still get Computer Modern
for Math, though main text is in Palatino). Thanks very much!
[example missing]
Best wishes,
Taco
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:00, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2-8-2010 3:35, Riobard wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how I can use Palatino for math in MKII/XeTeX? The following
works in MKIV but not in MKII (still get Computer Modern for Math, though
main text is in Palatino). Thanks very much!
in type
at 7:58 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:00, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2-8-2010 3:35, Riobard wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how I can use Palatino for math in MKII/XeTeX? The following
works in MKIV but not in MKII (still get Computer Modern for Math
) xetex has changed
I can test if taking XeTeX from TeX Live into minimals changes anything.
how does your tex file looks like (not that i'm too keen into diving into a
xetex related font proble right now)
This is a minimals file (already sent in the first mail):
\usetypescriptfile[type-gentium
has changed and refers to features
(2) xetex has changed
I can test if taking XeTeX from TeX Live into minimals changes anything.
how does your tex file looks like (not that i'm too keen into diving into a
xetex related font proble right now)
This is a minimals file (already sent in the first
has changed and refers to features
(2) xetex has changed
I can test if taking XeTeX from TeX Live into minimals changes anything.
btw, It runs ok on my machine, i don't have tl installed (I do have a
master copy but have now my system set up for minimals + dev trees) ...
i should probably
On 24-6-2010 9:54, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:48, Hans Hagen wrote:
also runs ok
Yes, in minimals it works fine. Also if I copy the XeTeX binary from
TL, it still works OK, it's only TL that is failing. Is it possible
that some settings in kpathsea/xetex font searching
.. what does
\settrue\tracexetexfonts
return? did they change the error recovery code, that is, this
\suppressfontnotfounderror
In TL I get:
fonts : no checking 3a: Zapfino:+liga;+kern;mapping=tlig;
fonts : no checking 3a: Zapfino:+liga;+kern;mapping=tlig;
fonts
On 24-6-2010 2:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
fonts : not found 1b: msbm10:+liga;+kern;mapping=tlig; at 9.0pt
fonts : found 1c: [msbm10]:+liga;+kern;mapping=tlig; at 9.0pt
fonts : not found 1a: msbm10:+liga;+kern;mapping=tlig; at 12.0pt
fonts : not found 1b:
On 23-6-2010 1:39, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
when processing it with
texexec --xtx filename
so ... xetex ... you're sure xetex is run?
(/Users/mojca/soft/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/spec-xet.mkii)
(/Users/mojca/soft/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/context/third/gentium/type-genti
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 03:24:09PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 23-6-2010 1:39, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
when processing it with
texexec --xtx filename
so ... xetex ... you're sure xetex is run?
(/Users/mojca/soft/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/spec-xet.mkii)
(/Users/mojca
On 23-6-2010 5:58, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
True. But lmmi7 *is* an old tfm font.
i don't think that i changed anything at the mkii end so there are two
possibilities then
(1) the math font definition has changed and refers to features
(2) xetex has changed
how does your tex file looks like
to features
Very likely, as shown by the error message (there shouldn't be any
featured passed to tfm fonts).
(2) xetex has changed
how does your tex file looks like (not that i'm too keen into diving
into a xetex related font proble right now)
--
Khaled Hosny
Arabic localiser and member
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 18:19, Nicola Vitacolonna wrote:
Somewhere in my twists and turns to get Mark IV working today, it appears
XeTeX has been broken. Running `texexec --xtx' on any ConTeXt file results
in:
! Undefined control sequence.
\PDFversion -1.\the \pdfminorversion
Hi, wondering
Somewhere in my twists and turns to get Mark IV working today, it appears
XeTeX has been broken. Running `texexec --xtx' on any ConTeXt file results
in:
! Undefined control sequence.
\PDFversion -1.\the \pdfminorversion
All I've been able to find out is that these macros are something
Somewhere in my twists and turns to get Mark IV working today, it appears
XeTeX has been broken. Running `texexec --xtx' on any ConTeXt file results
in:
! Undefined control sequence.
\PDFversion -1.\the \pdfminorversion
All I've been able to find out is that these macros are something to do
On 22-2-2010 4:18, James Fisher wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to TeX, ConTeXt, and XeTeX.
I'm progressing fine except for in one area: even though I'm told I'm using
the best possible software for easy typeface use in TeX, I'm finding this
area (i.e., fonts) confusing and badly documented
On Feb 22, 2010, at 4:18 AM, James Fisher wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to TeX, ConTeXt, and XeTeX.
I'm progressing fine except for in one area: even though I'm told
I'm using the best possible software for easy typeface use in TeX,
I'm finding this area (i.e., fonts) confusing and badly
Hi all,
I'm new to TeX, ConTeXt, and XeTeX.
I'm progressing fine except for in one area: even though I'm told I'm using
the best possible software for easy typeface use in TeX, I'm finding this
area (i.e., fonts) confusing and badly documented.
This is all the more surprising as what I want
2010/1/11 Vedran Miletić:
Hi,
I'm a new user of ConTeXt and minimals distribution and first I would
like to say to thank everyone involved in it. Like most LaTeX users, I
found something that was very hard to do in LaTeX to be fairly trivial
in ConTeXt, and gave it a shot.
Nevertheless,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
Utf-8 math input that works with pdftex (α, β, etc) does not work with
xetex. Is this by design, or a recent bug?
Minimal example
\enableregime[utf-8]
\starttext $α β$ \stoptext
i have no plans of adding unicode math support to mkii for xetex , al
least
Am 12.09.2009 um 05:31 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
How do I remove font features with xetex?
Does \definefontfeature[default][default][liga=no] work?
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 08.09.2009 um 06:56 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Hi,
Is there a monospaced font which matches with Latin Modern and
contains greek letters?
Computer Modern Unicode Sans Serif
How do I remove font features with xetex? I
Am 12.09.2009 um 14:50 schrieb Hans Hagen:
what happens if you define 'none' to disable liga explicitly
the three argument version of \definefontfeature is more handy but the
definition for mkii makes no sense
\def\dodefinefontfeature[#1][#2][#3]%
{\doifassignmentelse{#2}
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 08.09.2009 um 06:56 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Hi,
Is there a monospaced font which matches with Latin Modern and contains
greek letters?
Computer Modern Unicode Sans Serif
How do I remove font features with xetex? I have the following
Hi all,
something interesting from the XeTeX mailing list.
Dear all,
I've noticed that there a lot of decent, free Unicode fonts available,
some of which have interesting OpenType features to play with with
XeTeX. I've put together the following PDF as a general guide and
would
like any
i had no idea that the free ver. of minion pro came with small caps an
od st nums.
thanks for the link.
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi all,
something interesting from the XeTeX mailing list.
Dear all,
I've noticed that there a lot of decent, free Unicode fonts available,
some of which have
the XeTeX mailing list.
Dear all,
I've noticed that there a lot of decent, free Unicode fonts available,
some of which have interesting OpenType features to play with with
XeTeX. I've put together the following PDF as a general guide and would
like any suggestions or comments from the list
Am 29.08.2009 um 20:06 schrieb Derek CORDEIRO:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Mohamed Bana mbana.li...@googlemail.com
wrote:
i had no idea that the free ver. of minion pro came with small caps
an od
st nums.
I don't think its really free. If you download, you will be told so:
*Note:*
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:40:49 -0600, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 29.08.2009 um 20:06 schrieb Derek CORDEIRO:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Mohamed Bana
mbana.li...@googlemail.comwrote:
i had no idea that the free ver. of minion pro came with small caps
Am 29.08.2009 um 23:05 schrieb Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي
حامد:
Err, can you provide at least a 1-sentence summary in English?
The question was if it's possible to install the fonts (Minion, Myriad
etc.)
in the windows font directory and use them with other programs than
Adobe
Hi,
Guess what happens when you run this with xetex
\starttext\recurselevel\stoptext
This is a side effect of the definition of \dofastrecurse. After using
\dofastrecurse, the default value of recurselevel is
\number\fastrecursecounter rather than 0. I don't think that this will
have any
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
Guess what happens when you run this with xetex
\starttext\recurselevel\stoptext
This is a side effect of the definition of \dofastrecurse. After using
\dofastrecurse, the default value of recurselevel is
\number\fastrecursecounter rather than 0. I don't think
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
Guess what happens when you run this with xetex
\starttext\recurselevel\stoptext
This is a side effect of the definition of \dofastrecurse. After using
\dofastrecurse, the default value of recurselevel is
\number
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I do not think that any change is needed (One shouldn't use
\recurselevel outside a recursion macro anyways). I was just surprised
to find that recurselevel was defaulting to such a weird value in xetex.
also in luatex but that will probably change once we have more
Dear list,
I'm part of a design group Open Source Publishing, and we use ConTeXt
for a few months now. The main goal is to produce a 200+ pages multi-
lingual art book for which we have in the past months some exchanges
with kind members of the list about font install and Xetex. I
of the list about font install and
Xetex. I currently work more on the design itself.
To finish on time, avoid loosing time on some hazardous/random
errors, and also learning ConTeXt more from the inside, we're
looking for a person interested to have a commissioned work -for a
fair price
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: William Adams will.ad...@frycomm.com
Datum: 26. Mai 2009 17:38:29 MESZ
An: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms xe...@tug.org
Betreff: [XeTeX] ANN: Custom Stories, Inc. using xelatex now live
Antwort an: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X
On May 26, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Wolfgang Schuster quoted my having written:
The typesetting is done using XeLaTeX, and I don't believe would've
been as effective using any other tool.
That should probably say:
The typesetting is done using XeTeX, and I don't believe it would've
been
Hi, Hans and Mojca:
first, (to Mojca) the first-setup.sh script still deletes fontconfig
cache when updating on windows.
second, (to Hans) unicode-letters.tex is read when we dump plain TeX
or LaTeX format in TeXLive. This file is wrote by Jonathan Kew in
order to initialize XeTeX. It defines
Yue Wang wrote:
second, (to Hans) unicode-letters.tex is read when we dump plain TeX
or LaTeX format in TeXLive. This file is wrote by Jonathan Kew in
order to initialize XeTeX. It defines many important unicode
properties into XeTeX. However, ConTeXt do not load that file when
dumping
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 18:38, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans and Mojca:
first, (to Mojca) the first-setup.sh script still deletes fontconfig
cache when updating on windows.
Hmmm ... while experimenting a bit and after writing a long answer
explaining that I'll come back to it after a while ... I
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hans, does this make sense?
local normalflags = states.get(rsync.flags.normal)
local deleteflags =
if (destination:find(texmf$) or destination:find(context$)) and
(not environment.argument(keep)) then
deleteflags = states.get(rsync.flags.delete)
end
command =
).
But LM should suffer from the same problem.
How can I speed up math font loading? change add file: suffix (like
[file:rm-iwonar]) won't help :(
Core macros need to be changed somehow if you want to achieve that.
Hans doesn't use XeTeX, so you need strong arguments to convince him
to modify
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 03:44, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Mojca:
However, when comment the second line (\definetypeface [iwona] [mm]
[math] [iwona] [default] [encoding=ec]),
TeXExec | runtime: 1.828
total
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 03:08, Yue Wang wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Where is that cache located? (Are you talking about windows?) Maybe we
could prevent deleting the font cache. This might solve your problem.
I think it is in the
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 13:18, Yue Wang wrote:
But LM should suffer from the same problem.
I think LM tfm/otf metrics information are dumped to fmt statically.
See the TeX82 source code (don't know xetex's situation, but i am sure
tex82 works like that).
That's possible. But if you remove
,
that would likely solve most issues.
But one could also ask Jonathan to make XeTeX accept a less terse
and idiosyncratic font syntax. As it stands you can't feed an
arbitrary font name (which may contain spaces) into the non
quoted syntax (because then the quoted syntax is actually
required for tfm
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 03:44, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Mojca:
However, when comment the second line (\definetypeface [iwona] [mm]
[math] [iwona] [default] [encoding=ec]),
TeXExec | runtime:
1 - 100 of 700 matches
Mail list logo
